Skip to content

Conversation

@hi-ogawa
Copy link
Contributor

@hi-ogawa hi-ogawa commented Mar 18, 2025

Description

I just saw a huge useless diff and remembered we didn't change the default yet. I'm not sure if we discussed about the default. Starting this PR to revive the discussion if we haven't.

Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. If the feature is substantial or introduces breaking changes without a discussion, PR might be closed.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Tests

  • Run the tests with pnpm test:ci.

Documentation

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs command.

Changesets

  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Deploy Preview for vitest-dev ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9438bcd
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/vitest-dev/deploys/67da066b68ab90000806abc3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-7697--vitest-dev.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@hi-ogawa hi-ogawa marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2025 00:15
Boshen pushed a commit to oxc-project/oxc that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
- fixed `@vitest/browser` version mismatch
- removed `--typecheck` since `tsc` catches same errors (and honestly
vitest typecheck mode is not so intuitive 🙃)
- added `diff.expand: false` since raw transfer mismatch is huge (we
might change the default on Vitest side
vitest-dev/vitest#7697)
@hi-ogawa hi-ogawa added the p2-to-be-discussed Enhancement under consideration (priority) label Mar 20, 2025
@hi-ogawa hi-ogawa moved this to P2 - 2 in Team Board Mar 20, 2025
@sheremet-va sheremet-va merged commit f342065 into vitest-dev:main Mar 28, 2025
14 checks passed
@hi-ogawa hi-ogawa deleted the feat-diff-expand-false-default branch March 29, 2025 02:11
@renovate renovate bot mentioned this pull request Apr 21, 2025
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

p2-to-be-discussed Enhancement under consideration (priority)

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants