Skip to content

ENG-960 Improve DX for base DG queries #488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ENG-960 Improve DX for base DG queries #488

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
499055d
WIP
mdroidian Oct 13, 2025
62b9117
Pushed author into scope. Removed unneeded slow functions. Pushed gro…
maparent Oct 16, 2025
4666fe1
forgot to revert changes to stepdefs
maparent Oct 16, 2025
dea98bf
rebase error
maparent Oct 16, 2025
bffce97
reinstate and expand jdoc for getConcepts
maparent Oct 18, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion apps/roam/src/components/settings/AdminPanel.tsx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -160,7 +160,13 @@ const AdminPanel = () => {
await getConcepts({
supabase,
spaceId,
schemaLocalIds: showingSchema.sourceLocalId,
scope: {
schemas:
showingSchema.sourceLocalId ===
nodeSchemaSignature.sourceLocalId,
type: "nodes",
ofType: [showingSchema.sourceLocalId],
},
}),
);
} catch (e) {
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions packages/database/features/queryConcepts.feature
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Feature: Concept queries
| c9 | opposes 2 | s1 | user2 | 2025/01/01 | 2025/01/01 | false | c5 | {} | {"target": "c8", "source": "c2"} |

Scenario Outline: Query all nodes
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"schemaLocalIds":[],"fetchNodes":null}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"scope":{"type":"all"}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @_reference_content |
| c2 | claim 1 | s1 | user1 | false | c1 | {} |
Expand All @@ -59,54 +59,54 @@ Feature: Concept queries
| c9 | opposes 2 | s1 | user2 | false | c5 | {"target": "c8", "source": "c2"} |

Scenario Outline: Query node schemas
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"fetchNodes":null}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"scope":{"schemas":true}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @literal_content | @reference_content | _represented_by_id |
| c1 | Claim | s1 | user1 | true | | {} | {} | ct1 |
| c5 | Opposes | s1 | user1 | true | | {"roles": ["target", "source"]} | {} | ct5 |
| c7 | Hypothesis | s1 | user1 | true | | {} | {} | ct7 |

Scenario Outline: Query by node types
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"schemaLocalIds":["lct1"]}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"scope":{"ofType":["lct1"]}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @literal_content | @reference_content |
| c2 | claim 1 | s1 | user1 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
| c3 | claim 2 | s1 | user2 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
| c4 | claim 3 | s1 | user3 | false | c1 | {} | {} |

Scenario Outline: Query by author
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"nodeAuthor":"user2","schemaLocalIds":[],"fetchNodes":null}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"scope":{"author":"user2","type":"all"}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @literal_content | @_reference_content |
| c3 | claim 2 | s1 | user2 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
| c6 | opposes 1 | s1 | user2 | false | c5 | {} | {"target": "c3", "source": "c2"} |
| c9 | opposes 2 | s1 | user2 | false | c5 | {} | {"target": "c8", "source": "c2"} |

Scenario Outline: Query by relation type
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"inRelsOfTypeLocal":["lct5"],"schemaLocalIds":[]}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"relations":{"ofType":["lct5"]}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @literal_content | @_reference_content |
| c2 | claim 1 | s1 | user1 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
| c3 | claim 2 | s1 | user2 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
| c8 | hypothesis 1 | s1 | user3 | false | c7 | {} | {} |

Scenario Outline: Query by related node type
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"inRelsToNodesOfTypeLocal":["lct7"],"schemaLocalIds":[]}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"relations":{"toNodeType":["lct7"]}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @literal_content | @_reference_content |
| c2 | claim 1 | s1 | user1 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
| c8 | hypothesis 1 | s1 | user3 | false | c7 | {} | {} |

# Note that the node is related to itself, unfortunate but hard to solve.
Scenario Outline: Query by author of related node
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"schemaLocalIds":[],"inRelsToNodesOfAuthor":"user3","relationFields":["id"],"relationSubNodesFields":["id"]}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"relations":{"author":"user3"},"fields":{"relations":["id"],"relationNodes":["id"]}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @literal_content | @_reference_content |
| c2 | claim 1 | s1 | user1 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
| c8 | hypothesis 1 | s1 | user3 | false | c7 | {} | {} |

Scenario Outline: Query by related node
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"schemaLocalIds":[],"inRelsToNodeLocalIds":["lct2"]}'
And a user logged in space s1 and calling getConcepts with these parameters: '{"relations":{"toNodeId":["lct2"]}}'
Then query results should look like this
| _id | name | _space_id | _author_id | @is_schema | _schema_id | @literal_content | @_reference_content |
| c2 | claim 1 | s1 | user1 | false | c1 | {} | {} |
Expand Down
Loading