Skip to content

Conversation

@BaraMGB
Copy link
Contributor

@BaraMGB BaraMGB commented May 16, 2019

fixes #4786

@BaraMGB BaraMGB added the needs code review A functional code review is currently required for this PR label May 16, 2019
@Spekular
Copy link
Member

Spekular commented May 24, 2019

For whatever my code review is worth:

No cosmetic issues since you're just replacing the function called, no concern about the actual logic of the fix either. Have you tested if this fix works with oversampling enabled?

Just as a note-to-self: If that were to fail, outputSampleRate() might be the way to go.

void SampleBuffer::normalizeSampleRate( const sample_rate_t _src_sr,
bool _keep_settings )
{
// do samplerate-conversion to our default-samplerate
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// do samplerate-conversion to our default-samplerate
// do samplerate-conversion to our processing-samplerate

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On second thought, this comment should be changed, unless this line was changed by mistake.

@BaraMGB
Copy link
Contributor Author

BaraMGB commented May 25, 2019

I close this in favor of a solution of @Reflexe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs code review A functional code review is currently required for this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sample track out of sync with jack

2 participants