Skip to content

Conversation

@jvandort
Copy link
Contributor

This updates throwIfNullOrUndefined to take in & print the name of the parameter being checked. This PR in response to this comment here.

The signature of throwIfNulllOrUndefined was changed to make nickname non-optional, but based on apis.mustache the param will never be undefined. Granted, the change is breaking, but this is also merging into 5.0.x. I considered removing the other deprecated exports in runtime.mustache (since this is merging into 5.0.x), but I figured I would not in this PR and ask for opinions about that here.

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • If contributing template-only or documentation-only changes which will change sample output, build the project before.
  • Run the shell script(s) under ./bin/ (or Windows batch scripts under.\bin\windows) to update Petstore samples related to your fix. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit, and these must match the expectations made by your contribution. You only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh, ./bin/openapi3/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the code or mustache templates for a language ({LANG}) (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc).
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master, 4.3.x, 5.0.x. Default: master.
  • Copy the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

@TiFu (2017/07) @taxpon (2017/07) @sebastianhaas (2017/07) @kenisteward (2017/07) @Vrolijkx (2017/09) @macjohnny (2018/01) @topce (2018/10) @akehir (2019/07) @petejohansonxo (2019/11) @amakhrov (2020/02)

@auto-labeler
Copy link

auto-labeler bot commented Apr 28, 2020

👍 Thanks for opening this issue!
🏷 I have applied any labels matching special text in your issue.

The team will review the labels and make any necessary changes.

Copy link
Member

@macjohnny macjohnny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@macjohnny macjohnny added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Apr 28, 2020
@macjohnny
Copy link
Member

cc @denyo

Copy link
Contributor

@TiFu TiFu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM too

@wing328 wing328 closed this May 11, 2020
@jvandort
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wing328 why the close?

@macjohnny
Copy link
Member

Ping @wing328

@TiFu
Copy link
Contributor

TiFu commented May 16, 2020

Possibly because the 5.0.x branch has been deleted? Is there a cut-off for the 5.0.x release?

@macjohnny
Copy link
Member

@jtvd78 please open a new PR against master

@jvandort
Copy link
Contributor Author

@macjohnny #6368

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants