Editor: Reshape blocks state under own key #11315
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Extracted from #10844
This pull request seeks to refactor blocks state to track blocks state as a single subtree within the
editorreducer.Before:
editoreditsblocksByClientIdblockOrderAfter:
editoreditsblocksbyClientIdorderThe rationale for this change is in better representing treatment the two as a collective unit, facilitating work in #10844 to shift the
isDirtytracking fromeditortoblocks, and enabling the simplification of e.g. memoized selector cache-busting, which can reference the singleeditor.blocks(where previously it would enumerate bothblocksByClientIdandblockOrder).Testing instructions:
This is a refactoring change. There should be no notable impact on behavior.