Skip to content

Conversation

@sarutak
Copy link
Member

@sarutak sarutak commented Aug 9, 2014

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 9, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1868. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18259/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 9, 2014

QA results for PR 1868:
- This patch FAILED unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18259/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 9, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1868. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18260/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 9, 2014

QA results for PR 1868:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18260/consoleFull

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for submitting this. I have a similar fix (using *args, **kwargs) pending in a big commit that fixes all of the Python 2.6 issues, so I'd like to hold off on merging this for now.

JoshRosen added a commit to JoshRosen/spark that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2014
- Modify python/run-tests to test with Python 2.6, if available.
- Use unittest2 when running on Python 2.6.
- Fix issue with namedtuple.
- Skip TestOutputFormat.test_newhadoop on Python 2.6 until SPARK-2951 is fixed.

Closes apache#1868.  Closes apache#1042.
@sarutak
Copy link
Member Author

sarutak commented Aug 11, 2014

@JoshRosen O.K. will close this.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in db06a81 Aug 11, 2014
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2014
…2.6 Fixes

- Modify python/run-tests to test with Python 2.6
- Use unittest2 when running on Python 2.6.
- Fix issue with namedtuple.
- Skip TestOutputFormat.test_newhadoop on Python 2.6 until SPARK-2951 is fixed.
- Fix MLlib _deserialize_double on Python 2.6.

Closes #1868.  Closes #1042.

Author: Josh Rosen <[email protected]>

Closes #1874 from JoshRosen/python2.6 and squashes the following commits:

983d259 [Josh Rosen] [SPARK-2954] Fix MLlib _deserialize_double on Python 2.6.
5d18fd7 [Josh Rosen] [SPARK-2948] [SPARK-2910] [SPARK-2101] Python 2.6 fixes

(cherry picked from commit db06a81)
Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <[email protected]>
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
…2.6 Fixes

- Modify python/run-tests to test with Python 2.6
- Use unittest2 when running on Python 2.6.
- Fix issue with namedtuple.
- Skip TestOutputFormat.test_newhadoop on Python 2.6 until SPARK-2951 is fixed.
- Fix MLlib _deserialize_double on Python 2.6.

Closes apache#1868.  Closes apache#1042.

Author: Josh Rosen <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1874 from JoshRosen/python2.6 and squashes the following commits:

983d259 [Josh Rosen] [SPARK-2954] Fix MLlib _deserialize_double on Python 2.6.
5d18fd7 [Josh Rosen] [SPARK-2948] [SPARK-2910] [SPARK-2101] Python 2.6 fixes
davies pushed a commit to davies/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2014
…2.6 Fixes

- Modify python/run-tests to test with Python 2.6
- Use unittest2 when running on Python 2.6.
- Fix issue with namedtuple.
- Skip TestOutputFormat.test_newhadoop on Python 2.6 until SPARK-2951 is fixed.
- Fix MLlib _deserialize_double on Python 2.6.

Closes apache#1868.  Closes apache#1042.

Author: Josh Rosen <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1874 from JoshRosen/python2.6 and squashes the following commits:

983d259 [Josh Rosen] [SPARK-2954] Fix MLlib _deserialize_double on Python 2.6.
5d18fd7 [Josh Rosen] [SPARK-2948] [SPARK-2910] [SPARK-2101] Python 2.6 fixes

Conflicts:
	python/pyspark/mllib/_common.py
	python/pyspark/serializers.py
	python/pyspark/tests.py
@sarutak sarutak deleted the SPARK-2948 branch April 11, 2015 05:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants