Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions docs/_data/menu-sql.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@
url: sql-performance-tuning.html#optimizing-the-join-strategy
- text: Adaptive Query Execution
url: sql-performance-tuning.html#adaptive-query-execution
- text: Storage Partition Join
url: sql-performance-tuning.html#storage-partition-join
- text: Distributed SQL Engine
url: sql-distributed-sql-engine.html
subitems:
Expand Down
119 changes: 119 additions & 0 deletions docs/sql-performance-tuning.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -428,3 +428,122 @@ You can control the details of how AQE works by providing your own cost evaluato
<td>3.2.0</td>
</tr>
</table>

## Storage Partition Join

Storage Partition Join (SPJ) is an optimization technique in Spark SQL that makes use the existing storage layout to avoid the shuffle phase.

This is a generalization of the concept of Bucket Joins, which is only applicable for [bucketed](sql-data-sources-load-save-functions.html#bucketing-sorting-and-partitioning) tables, to tables partitioned by functions registered in FunctionCatalog. Storage Partition Joins are currently supported for compatible V2 DataSources.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: this bucketed link doesn't work

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, i built the site and it seems to work, but let me know if another one is better here?


The following SQL properties enable Storage Partition Join in different join queries with various optimizations.

<table class="spark-config">
<thead><tr><th>Property Name</th><th>Default</th><th>Meaning</th><th>Since Version</th></tr></thead>
<tr>
<td><code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.enabled</code></td>
<td>false</td>
<td>
When true, try to eliminate shuffle by using the partitioning reported by a compatible V2 data source.
</td>
<td>3.3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.pushPartValues.enabled</code></td>
<td>true</td>
<td>
When enabled, try to eliminate shuffle if one side of the join has missing partition values from the other side. This config requires <code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.enabled</code> to be true.
</td>
<td>3.4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>spark.sql.requireAllClusterKeysForCoPartition</code></td>
<td>true</td>
<td>
When true, require the join or MERGE keys to be same and in the same order as the partition keys to eliminate shuffle. Hence, set to <b>false</b> in this situation to eliminate shuffle.
</td>
<td>3.4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.partiallyClusteredDistribution.enabled</code></td>
<td>false</td>
<td>
When true, and when the join is not a full outer join, enable skew optimizations to handle partitions with large amounts of data when avoiding shuffle. One side will be chosen as the big table based on table statistics, and the splits on this side will be partially-clustered. The splits of the other side will be grouped and replicated to match. This config requires both <code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.enabled</code> and <code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.pushPartValues.enabled</code> to be true.
</td>
<td>3.4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.allowJoinKeysSubsetOfPartitionKeys.enabled</code></td>
<td>false</td>
<td>
When enabled, try to avoid shuffle if join or MERGE condition does not include all partition columns. This config requires both <code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.enabled</code> and <code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.pushPartValues.enabled</code> to be true, and <code>spark.sql.requireAllClusterKeysForCoPartition</code> to be false.
</td>
<td>4.0.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.allowCompatibleTransforms.enabled</code></td>
<td>false</td>
<td>
When enabled, try to avoid shuffle if partition transforms are compatible but not identical. This config requires both <code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.enabled</code> and <code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.pushPartValues.enabled</code> to be true.
</td>
<td>4.0.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><code>spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.shuffle.enabled</code></td>
<td>false</td>
<td>
When enabled, try to avoid shuffle on one side of the join, by recognizing the partitioning reported by a V2 data source on the other side.
</td>
<td>4.0.0</td>
</tr>
</table>

If Storage Partition Join is performed, the query plan will not contain Exchange nodes prior to the join.

The following example uses Iceberg ([https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-getting-started/](https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-getting-started/)), a Spark V2 DataSource that supports Storage Partition Join.
```sql
CREATE TABLE prod.db.target (id INT, salary INT, dep STRING)
USING iceberg
PARTITIONED BY (dep, bucket(8, id))

CREATE TABLE prod.db.source (id INT, salary INT, dep STRING)
USING iceberg
PARTITIONED BY (dep, bucket(8, id))

EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM target t INNER JOIN source s
ON t.dep = s.dep AND t.id = s.id

-- Plan without Storage Partition Join
== Physical Plan ==
* Project (12)
+- * SortMergeJoin Inner (11)
:- * Sort (5)
: +- Exchange (4) // DATA SHUFFLE
: +- * Filter (3)
: +- * ColumnarToRow (2)
: +- BatchScan (1)
+- * Sort (10)
+- Exchange (9) // DATA SHUFFLE
+- * Filter (8)
+- * ColumnarToRow (7)
+- BatchScan (6)


SET 'spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.enabled' 'true'
SET 'spark.sql.iceberg.planning.preserve-data-grouping' 'true'
SET 'spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.pushPartValues.enabled' 'true'
SET 'spark.sql.requireAllClusterKeysForCoPartition' 'false'
SET 'spark.sql.sources.v2.bucketing.partiallyClusteredDistribution.enabled' 'true'

-- Plan with Storage Partition Join
== Physical Plan ==
* Project (10)
+- * SortMergeJoin Inner (9)
:- * Sort (4)
: +- * Filter (3)
: +- * ColumnarToRow (2)
: +- BatchScan (1)
+- * Sort (8)
+- * Filter (7)
+- * ColumnarToRow (6)
+- BatchScan (5)
```