Skip to content

Conversation

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a followup of #49474 that properly assigns the value to timeout.

Why are the changes needed?

It was a mistake that did not assign the value back.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Yes, same as #49474

How was this patch tested?

Manually.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Merged to master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants