Prefer AES-256 to AES-128. #25
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Motivation: The industry has been moving towards preferring larger key sizes in AES. We should reflect that. Modifications: - Prefer AES-256 to AES-128. Result: More connections with larger key sizes.
Joannis
approved these changes
May 29, 2020
Contributor
Joannis
left a comment
Joannis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks like a good change with a good motivation. I've got nothing to add.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
The industry has been moving towards preferring larger key sizes in AES.
We should reflect that.
Modifications:
Result:
More connections with larger key sizes.