Add Interop hardfork #2095
Merged
Add Interop hardfork #2095
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #2095 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
mattsse
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2025
Collaborator
mattsse
left a comment
mattsse
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this seems fine, even if interop doens't have any evm changes we should probably still introduce a dedicated variant?
would remove a few todos in reth and unblock work on interop which sin't blocked by isthmus
rakita
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
Member
rakita
left a comment
rakita
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe LATEST would be better but I dont mind having INTEROP
This was referenced Feb 21, 2025
Closed
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #2096
For consistency paradigmxyz/reth#14582 (comment)
For paradigmxyz/reth#14582