Skip to content

Conversation

@petemill
Copy link
Member

@petemill petemill commented Oct 4, 2024

e.g. when the .gclient file is modified, it will tell you that's why it's doing a big sync

Resolves

Submitter Checklist:

  • I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed and no other type of reviews are needed, or that I have requested them
  • There is a ticket for my issue
  • Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
  • Wrote a good PR/commit description
  • Squashed any review feedback or "fixup" commits before merge, so that history is a record of what happened in the repo, not your PR
  • Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
  • Checked the PR locally:
    • npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests wiki
    • npm run presubmit wiki, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
  • Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

  • A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
  • New files have MPL-2.0 license header
  • Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
  • Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
  • Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
  • Code follows the style guide
  • Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

Test Plan:

@petemill petemill requested a review from goodov October 4, 2024 21:52
@petemill petemill self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
@petemill petemill requested a review from a team as a code owner October 4, 2024 21:52
@petemill petemill force-pushed the command-sync-log-tweak branch from 44a2af1 to 28fc392 Compare October 10, 2024 23:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants