Skip to content

Conversation

@brettfo
Copy link
Member

@brettfo brettfo commented May 22, 2019

No description provided.

@brettfo brettfo requested a review from dsyme May 22, 2019 23:31
@brettfo brettfo force-pushed the up-to-date branch 2 times, most recently from bbe734c to 7c0affd Compare May 22, 2019 23:52
@brettfo
Copy link
Member Author

brettfo commented May 23, 2019

Up-to-date check passed in this run.

I have now temporarily reverted #6795 to see if it appropriately fails.

@brettfo brettfo changed the title add CI leg to verify assemblies aren't unnecessarily being rebuilt [WIP] add CI leg to verify assemblies aren't unnecessarily being rebuilt May 23, 2019
@brettfo
Copy link
Member Author

brettfo commented May 23, 2019

Revert of #6795 caused the expected failure:

19 of 28 assemblies were re-compiled
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.VS.FSI\Release\net472\FSharp.VS.FSI.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Build\Release\net472\FSharp.Build.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Core\Release\netstandard1.6\FSharp.Core.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Core\Release\net45\FSharp.Core.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Compiler.Interactive.Settings\Release\netstandard2.0\FSharp.Compiler.Interactive.Settings.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Core.UnitTests\Release\netcoreapp2.1\FSharp.Core.UnitTests.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Editor\Release\net472\FSharp.Editor.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Build.UnitTests\Release\netcoreapp2.1\FSharp.Build.UnitTests.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.LanguageService\Release\net472\FSharp.LanguageService.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Compiler.UnitTests\Release\net472\FSharp.Compiler.UnitTests.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.LanguageService.Base\Release\net472\FSharp.LanguageService.Base.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Core.UnitTests\Release\net472\FSharp.Core.UnitTests.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Compiler.UnitTests\Release\netcoreapp2.1\FSharp.Compiler.UnitTests.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Compiler.Private\Release\net472\FSharp.Compiler.Private.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Build.UnitTests\Release\net472\FSharp.Build.UnitTests.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Compiler.Private\Release\netstandard2.0\FSharp.Compiler.Private.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Compiler.Server.Shared\Release\net472\FSharp.Compiler.Server.Shared.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Build\Release\netcoreapp2.1\FSharp.Build.dll
    D:\a\1\s\artifacts\bin\FSharp.Compiler.Interactive.Settings\Release\net472\FSharp.Compiler.Interactive.Settings.dll

@brettfo brettfo changed the title [WIP] add CI leg to verify assemblies aren't unnecessarily being rebuilt add CI leg to verify assemblies aren't unnecessarily being rebuilt May 23, 2019
@brettfo brettfo merged commit 4f50cd6 into dotnet:master May 24, 2019
@brettfo brettfo deleted the up-to-date branch May 24, 2019 18:02
KevinRansom pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019
…6808)

* relax indentations

* fix baseline

* add diagnostics

* add diagnostics

* diagnostics

* diagnostics

* diagnostics

* add diagnostics and possible fix for tp smoke tests

* fix build

* fix build

* more diagnostics

* try to fix flaky test

* Update neg77.fsx

* fix build

* try to fix dodgy test

* Fix unused opens false positive for record fields (#6846)

* Fix unused opens false positive for record fields

* Add record check

* add CI leg to verify assemblies aren't unnecessarily being rebuilt (#6816)

* Removing option from Tuple active pattern (#6772)
@dsyme
Copy link
Contributor

dsyme commented Jun 7, 2019

@brettfo Thank you thank you thank you!!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants