Skip to content

Conversation

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Mar 28, 2023

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn

  • Subscription: 03acf5d2-59bd-494b-c390-08d8e9750d9d
  • Build: 20230410.15
  • Date Produced: April 11, 2023 5:23:40 AM UTC
  • Commit: a10bbf218cbd333e13a5387661c73f9b4077bd48
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/dev17.6-vs-deps

…328.7

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-2.23178.7
@ghost ghost added Area-CodeFlow untriaged Request triage from a team member labels Mar 28, 2023
…328.8

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-2.23178.8
@v-wuzhai
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

…328.21

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23178.21
@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:

@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure

Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.

  • This pull request contains changes from your source repo (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn) and seems to have failed checks in this PR. Please take a peek at the failures and comment if they seem relevant to your changes.
  • If you're being tagged in this comment it is due to an entry in the related Maestro Subscription of the Build Asset Registry. If you feel this entry has added your GitHub login or your GitHub team in error, please update the subscription to reflect this.
  • For more details, please read the Arcade Darc documentation

@marek-safar
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like there was a change in Roslyn API about how empty types are written.

@jaredpar to double check if that's expected.

@jaredpar
Copy link
Member

@CyrusNajmabadi, @333fred did we change how the syntax formatter is emitting empty types? This delta in the test in coming from the GenAPI layer (which uses the formatte). Essentially looks like empty types had a change here:

// old
struct S { }
// new
struct S
{
}

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member

Might have been fallout from a @DoctorKrolic change? I can look when I get into work. Seems like a totally reasonable change to me though

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:

@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure

Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.

  • This pull request contains changes from your source repo (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn) and seems to have failed checks in this PR. Please take a peek at the failures and comment if they seem relevant to your changes.
  • If you're being tagged in this comment it is due to an entry in the related Maestro Subscription of the Build Asset Registry. If you feel this entry has added your GitHub login or your GitHub team in error, please update the subscription to reflect this.
  • For more details, please read the Arcade Darc documentation

2 similar comments
@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:

@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure

Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.

  • This pull request contains changes from your source repo (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn) and seems to have failed checks in this PR. Please take a peek at the failures and comment if they seem relevant to your changes.
  • If you're being tagged in this comment it is due to an entry in the related Maestro Subscription of the Build Asset Registry. If you feel this entry has added your GitHub login or your GitHub team in error, please update the subscription to reflect this.
  • For more details, please read the Arcade Darc documentation

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:

@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure

Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.

  • This pull request contains changes from your source repo (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn) and seems to have failed checks in this PR. Please take a peek at the failures and comment if they seem relevant to your changes.
  • If you're being tagged in this comment it is due to an entry in the related Maestro Subscription of the Build Asset Registry. If you feel this entry has added your GitHub login or your GitHub team in error, please update the subscription to reflect this.
  • For more details, please read the Arcade Darc documentation

…329.15

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23179.15
…330.6

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23180.6
dotnet-maestro bot added 2 commits April 1, 2023 00:28
…331.6

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23181.6
…331.8

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23181.8
@nagilson
Copy link
Member

nagilson commented Apr 5, 2023

@NikolaMilosavljevic Is the other PR in a good state so we can merge that, and then merge this?

@NikolaMilosavljevic
Copy link
Member

@NikolaMilosavljevic Is the other PR in a good state so we can merge that, and then merge this?

Can you share the link to other PR? If it's this one (dotnet/installer#15961) then it's not needed, and I will close it once you merge this PR.

@nagilson
Copy link
Member

nagilson commented Apr 5, 2023

Indeed, that was the PR. So ... this formatting change is expected and we just need to update the expected output?

@NikolaMilosavljevic
Copy link
Member

Indeed, that was the PR. So ... this formatting change is expected and we just need to update the expected output?

I'm not sure about the formatting change - that is likely unrelated. My PR is simply patching source-build with a packaging change made by @mmitche in roslyn repo, few weeks ago: dotnet/roslyn#67206

@nagilson
Copy link
Member

nagilson commented Apr 6, 2023

@CyrusNajmabadi May you respond to the above please and fix up this PR if you have confirmed the behavior change was desired?

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member

I really don't have any context on that. I don't see any problem though with things getting formatted this way, so change seems fine to me.

@nagilson nagilson enabled auto-merge April 6, 2023 21:51
…406.9

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23206.9
@nagilson
Copy link
Member

nagilson commented Apr 7, 2023

@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure @mmitche 9 new prebuilts discovered here. Is this expected?

mmitche and others added 3 commits April 7, 2023 14:00
…407.4

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23207.4
…407.13

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23207.13
@joeloff
Copy link
Member

joeloff commented Apr 10, 2023

Looks like a prebuilt is failing source build: System.Composition.7.0.0

@MichaelSimons what is the guidance around this, is there some general process we need to follow?

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

Looks like a prebuilt is failing source build: System.Composition.7.0.0

@MichaelSimons what is the guidance around this, is there some general process we need to follow?

http://aka.ms/dotnet/prebuilts

@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Apr 10, 2023

Okay here's something interesting. The generator claimed to have not built System.Composition because it only builds for net4* and netcoreapp2.0 TFMs.

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

Okay here's something interesting. The generator claimed to have not built System.Composition because it only builds for net4* and netcoreapp2.0 TFMs.

Would be nice to know what TFM is required by roslyn. Perhaps it is a TFM that is filtered out by the tooling.

@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Apr 10, 2023

Oh! No, I'm incorrect. It's a text only package. What do we do about those?

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

Oh! No, I'm incorrect. It's a text only package. What do we do about those?

Add it to SBRP. You need to use the -type text option.

@joeloff
Copy link
Member

joeloff commented Apr 10, 2023

Oh! No, I'm incorrect. It's a text only package. What do we do about those?

Text only? You mean no code, just content files or something else?

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

Oh! No, I'm incorrect. It's a text only package. What do we do about those?

Text only? You mean no code, just content files or something else?

The package contains no binaries, only text based content files.

@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Apr 10, 2023

@joeloff
Copy link
Member

joeloff commented Apr 10, 2023

dotnet/source-build-reference-packages#619

So we wait for SB PR to flow, or should I exclude the package for now to unblock this PR?

@v-wuzhai
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lewing lewing closed this Apr 11, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled April 11, 2023 05:38

Pull request was closed

@lewing lewing reopened this Apr 11, 2023
…410.15

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset
 From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23210.15
@NikolaMilosavljevic
Copy link
Member

dotnet/source-build-reference-packages#619

There are still no PRs for updating Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.source-build-reference-packages. There is a daily subscription for flowing https://github.com/dotnet/source-build-reference-packages to dotnet/sdk. However, last update was on 4/5. @mmitche is there a way to check why SBRP stopped flowing to this repo?

@NikolaMilosavljevic
Copy link
Member

dotnet/source-build-reference-packages#619

There are still no PRs for updating Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.source-build-reference-packages. There is a daily subscription for flowing https://github.com/dotnet/source-build-reference-packages to dotnet/sdk. However, last update was on 4/5. @mmitche is there a way to check why SBRP stopped flowing to this repo?

SBRP flow is now in progress: #31707. After that's merged, this PR would need to be rebased.

@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Apr 11, 2023

I think these are Maestro timeouts? Not sure really....maybe related to legacy coherency dotnet/arcade-services#2687.

/cc @dotnet/dnceng

@riarenas
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, the daily dependency updates are not happening. Maestro is timing out dotnet/arcade#13109.

I triggered all the daily subscriptions manually today. Is #31707 the one you were looking for?

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot merged commit dd0b02f into main Apr 11, 2023
@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot deleted the darc-main-e5b4c870-f805-4f58-8338-1cc601e2fad0 branch April 11, 2023 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area-CodeFlow source-build untriaged Request triage from a team member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.