-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
[main] Update dependencies from dotnet/roslyn #31499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[main] Update dependencies from dotnet/roslyn #31499
Conversation
…328.7 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-2.23178.7
…328.8 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-2.23178.8
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…328.21 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23178.21
Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.
|
|
It looks like there was a change in Roslyn API about how empty types are written. @jaredpar to double check if that's expected. |
|
@CyrusNajmabadi, @333fred did we change how the syntax formatter is emitting empty types? This delta in the test in coming from the GenAPI layer (which uses the formatte). Essentially looks like empty types had a change here: // old
struct S { }
// new
struct S
{
} |
|
Might have been fallout from a @DoctorKrolic change? I can look when I get into work. Seems like a totally reasonable change to me though |
Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.
|
2 similar comments
Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.
|
Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn:@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.
|
…329.15 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23179.15
…330.6 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23180.6
…331.6 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23181.6
…331.8 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23181.8
|
@NikolaMilosavljevic Is the other PR in a good state so we can merge that, and then merge this? |
Can you share the link to other PR? If it's this one (dotnet/installer#15961) then it's not needed, and I will close it once you merge this PR. |
|
Indeed, that was the PR. So ... this formatting change is expected and we just need to update the expected output? |
I'm not sure about the formatting change - that is likely unrelated. My PR is simply patching source-build with a packaging change made by @mmitche in roslyn repo, few weeks ago: dotnet/roslyn#67206 |
|
@CyrusNajmabadi May you respond to the above please and fix up this PR if you have confirmed the behavior change was desired? |
|
I really don't have any context on that. I don't see any problem though with things getting formatted this way, so change seems fine to me. |
…406.9 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23206.9
|
@dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure @mmitche 9 new prebuilts discovered here. Is this expected? |
…407.4 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23207.4
…407.13 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23207.13
|
Looks like a prebuilt is failing source build: System.Composition.7.0.0 @MichaelSimons what is the guidance around this, is there some general process we need to follow? |
|
|
Okay here's something interesting. The generator claimed to have not built System.Composition because it only builds for net4* and netcoreapp2.0 TFMs. |
Would be nice to know what TFM is required by roslyn. Perhaps it is a TFM that is filtered out by the tooling. |
|
Oh! No, I'm incorrect. It's a text only package. What do we do about those? |
Add it to SBRP. You need to use the |
Text only? You mean no code, just content files or something else? |
The package contains no binaries, only text based content files. |
|
So we wait for SB PR to flow, or should I exclude the package for now to unblock this PR? |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…410.15 Microsoft.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces , Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild , Microsoft.Net.Compilers.Toolset From Version 4.6.0-2.23177.13 -> To Version 4.6.0-3.23210.15
|
There are still no PRs for updating |
SBRP flow is now in progress: #31707. After that's merged, this PR would need to be rebased. |
|
I think these are Maestro timeouts? Not sure really....maybe related to legacy coherency dotnet/arcade-services#2687. /cc @dotnet/dnceng |
|
Yes, the daily dependency updates are not happening. Maestro is timing out dotnet/arcade#13109. I triggered all the daily subscriptions manually today. Is #31707 the one you were looking for? |
This pull request updates the following dependencies
From https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn