Skip to content

Conversation

@jpadilla
Copy link
Contributor

@jpadilla jpadilla commented Oct 6, 2015

Follow up proposal fix for #3434 and #3437

@jpadilla
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tomchristie this is ready for a review

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't it be ret == {} and self.many ?

@xordoquy
Copy link
Contributor

I think I need to dig a bit why we get a dictionary in the first place. Feels like the root cause isn't fixed with this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants