-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 978
tests: replace many .unwrap()s with ?s using eyre #9111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
glehmann
wants to merge
7
commits into
jj-vcs:main
Choose a base branch
from
glehmann:gln/refactor-unwrap-to-question-mark-in-tests-lqyw
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+4,817
−4,936
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
465c748
testutils: use eyre::Result as TestResult
glehmann b202110
testutils: use color-eyre for backtrace display
glehmann dbdc038
testutils: add custom backtrace frame filter to color-eyre
glehmann c9b89b3
testutils: enable backtrace capture by default (RUST_BACKTRACE=1) in …
glehmann 80ee629
tests: `.block_on().unwrap()` with `.block_on()?` in tests using Test…
ilyagr e758f76
tests: Replace another ~600 `unwrap()`s in tests with `?`
ilyagr 3b5a9a7
tests: Replace Result.unwrap with ? operator in test functions
glehmann File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's nice that
color-eyrehas filtering functionality! That could be very helpful.I don't know if this filter is correct for all use-cases, though. Ideally, there's be a message letting you know that you can set
RUST_BACKTRACE=fullto get the full backtrace in the cases where this filters too much. (I haven't checked how easy that is to do).As per my other message, I'm thinking of
panic-s, notTestResultuse-cases.Aside: My PR has an example of a more complicated-looking filter that's similar to default panic handler frame filtering logic, for comparison. I'm not sure that's necessarily better; this stricter filter could be good in 90% of the cases if there was a way to disable it in the other 10%.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is an env var to set to disable the filtering, and it's displayed with the backtrace—see the screenshots in #9111 (comment)
The filtering is especially useful with
#[tokio::test]: the backtraces are much longer in that case—29 frames instead of just 7 with the#[test]for the same test failure.#[pollster::test]is a bit more at 9 frames.I like the way the error chains are displayed, but eyre alone already displays them well.
It may not be perfect every time, but it should work in most cases, produce much more compact and readable backtraces, also work with panics, and the filtering is easily deactivable when needed. I like it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you tested that it works, that your code doesn't override it?
It's fine if the filtering is not completely perfect, as long as it can be disabled; we can always fine-tune or even change our mind about using
color_eyrelater. So, I think that as long asCOLORBT_SHOW_HIDDENworks, that's sufficient.