Skip to content

Conversation

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

follow up from openshift/api#400

/cc @jcpowermac

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@abhinavdahiya: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jcpowermac.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

follow up from openshift/api#400

/cc @jcpowermac

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 7, 2019
@jcpowermac
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jcpowermac: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jcpowermac
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 7, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, jcpowermac

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9a6c112 into openshift:master Aug 7, 2019
wking added a commit to wking/cluster-version-operator that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
…a-bundle

The API docs [1] recommend avoiding trustedCA (unless you happen to be
the "proxy validator") and instead pulling the trust bundle from this
managed namespace.  The docs also explain that the trusted-ca-bundle
ConfigMap has already been merged with the system certificates, so we
don't need to inject those locally.  If trusted-ca-bundle doesn't
exist, we'll fall back to our local system store.

Our logic was touched most recently in 5968cdf (pkg: switch to
openshift-config for proxy CA, 2019-08-07, openshift#231), which resolved the
"looking in the wrong place" issue by looking at the trustedCA source
(which feeds the proxy validator).  With this commit we switch that
around and look at the proxy validator's output.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift/api/blob/f2a771e1a90ceb4e65f1ca2c8b11fc1ac6a66da8/config/v1/types_proxy.go#L44-L52
wking added a commit to wking/cluster-version-operator that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2020
…a-bundle

The API docs [1] recommend avoiding trustedCA (unless you happen to be
the "proxy validator") and instead pulling the trust bundle from this
managed namespace.  The docs also explain that the trusted-ca-bundle
ConfigMap has already been merged with the system certificates, so we
don't need to inject those locally.  If trusted-ca-bundle doesn't
exist, we'll fall back to our local system store.

Our logic was touched most recently in 5968cdf (pkg: switch to
openshift-config for proxy CA, 2019-08-07, openshift#231), which resolved the
"looking in the wrong place" issue by looking at the trustedCA source
(which feeds the proxy validator).  With this commit we switch that
around and look at the proxy validator's output.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift/api/blob/f2a771e1a90ceb4e65f1ca2c8b11fc1ac6a66da8/config/v1/types_proxy.go#L44-L52
wking added a commit to wking/cluster-version-operator that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2020
…a-bundle

The API docs [1] recommend avoiding trustedCA (unless you happen to be
the "proxy validator") and instead pulling the trust bundle from this
managed namespace.  The docs also explain that the trusted-ca-bundle
ConfigMap has already been merged with the system certificates, so we
don't need to inject those locally.  If trusted-ca-bundle doesn't
exist, we'll fall back to our local system store.

Our logic was touched most recently in 5968cdf (pkg: switch to
openshift-config for proxy CA, 2019-08-07, openshift#231), which resolved the
"looking in the wrong place" issue by looking at the trustedCA source
(which feeds the proxy validator).  With this commit we switch that
around and look at the proxy validator's output.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift/api/blob/f2a771e1a90ceb4e65f1ca2c8b11fc1ac6a66da8/config/v1/types_proxy.go#L44-L52
wking added a commit to wking/cluster-version-operator that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2020
…a-bundle

The API docs [1] recommend avoiding trustedCA (unless you happen to be
the "proxy validator") and instead pulling the trust bundle from this
managed namespace.  The docs also explain that the trusted-ca-bundle
ConfigMap has already been merged with the system certificates, so we
don't need to inject those locally.  If trusted-ca-bundle doesn't
exist, we'll fall back to our local system store.

Our logic was touched most recently in 5968cdf (pkg: switch to
openshift-config for proxy CA, 2019-08-07, openshift#231), which resolved the
"looking in the wrong place" issue by looking at the trustedCA source
(which feeds the proxy validator).  With this commit we switch that
around and look at the proxy validator's output.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift/api/blob/f2a771e1a90ceb4e65f1ca2c8b11fc1ac6a66da8/config/v1/types_proxy.go#L44-L52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants