OCPBUGS-37706: allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified #2135

sanchezl · 2024-11-15T21:50:43Z

No description provided.

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-11-15T21:50:53Z

@sanchezl: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

c681774|allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-11-16T19:22:30Z

@sanchezl: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

1caa9a8|allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

sanchezl · 2024-11-16T19:32:06Z

/hold until all operators support tls 1.3

Known issues:

etcd - OCPBUGS-43748: etcd pod containers do not start when tls min version is 1.3 cluster-etcd-operator#1364
storage -

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-11-17T03:50:54Z

@sanchezl: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37706, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

wangke19 · 2024-12-19T08:16:02Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-12-19T08:16:11Z

@wangke19: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37706, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

wangke19 · 2024-12-20T07:04:59Z

The PR has been pre-merge tested, got the expected results, detail see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-37706?focusedId=26306896&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-26306896

wangke19 · 2024-12-20T07:05:49Z

/label qe-approved
/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-12-20T07:05:58Z

@sanchezl: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37706, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

wangke19 · 2025-01-09T06:59:09Z

/test verify-commits

sanchezl · 2025-01-14T19:28:56Z

/hold cancel

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-01-14T19:34:46Z

@sanchezl: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

2516160|UPSTREAM: : allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

jacobsee · 2025-04-19T07:18:14Z

/retest-required

kevinrizza · 2025-04-19T15:27:14Z

/retest

dusk125 · 2025-04-19T18:08:16Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2025-04-20T01:44:38Z

/retest-required

jacobsee · 2025-04-20T05:00:38Z

/retest-required

jacobsee · 2025-04-20T06:41:44Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2025-04-20T12:32:10Z

/retest-required

jacobsee · 2025-04-20T19:51:24Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2025-04-20T23:41:34Z

/retest-required

wangke19 · 2025-04-21T05:02:25Z

/retest-required

wangke19 · 2025-04-21T11:10:51Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2025-04-21T12:03:14Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2025-04-21T15:32:38Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2025-04-21T18:25:06Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2025-04-21T19:20:55Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial

jacobsee · 2025-04-21T20:14:06Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial

dusk125 · 2025-04-21T21:05:46Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial

jacobsee · 2025-04-21T22:03:51Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial

openshift-ci · 2025-04-22T01:24:15Z

@sanchezl: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-04-22T01:28:13Z

@sanchezl: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37706: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37706 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-bot · 2025-04-22T04:28:07Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-pod
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-pod-container-v4.19.0-202504220341.p0.g76a7b99.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-04-22T04:34:15Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: kube-proxy
This PR has been included in build kube-proxy-container-v4.19.0-202504220341.p0.g76a7b99.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-04-22T04:37:08Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-hyperkube
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-hyperkube-container-v4.19.0-202504220341.p0.g76a7b99.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-04-22T04:43:08Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-kube-apiserver-artifacts
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-kube-apiserver-artifacts-container-v4.19.0-202504220341.p0.g76a7b99.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-04-22T15:09:06Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-hyperkube
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-hyperkube-container-v4.20.0-202504221340.p0.g76a7b99.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-bot · 2025-04-22T15:36:19Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-kube-apiserver-artifacts
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-kube-apiserver-artifacts-container-v4.20.0-202504221340.p0.g76a7b99.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

wangke19 · 2025-05-29T03:49:09Z

/cherry-pick release-4.18

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2025-05-29T03:51:47Z

@wangke19: new pull request created: #2315

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Nov 15, 2024

openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and p0lyn0mial November 15, 2024 21:52

sanchezl force-pushed the tlsmodern branch from c681774 to 1caa9a8 Compare November 16, 2024 19:22

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 16, 2024

sanchezl changed the title ~~allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified~~ OCPBUGS-37706: allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified Nov 17, 2024

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 19, 2024

openshift-ci bot requested a review from wangke19 December 19, 2024 08:16

openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Dec 20, 2024

openshift-ci bot assigned wangke19 Dec 20, 2024

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 20, 2024

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 14, 2025

sanchezl force-pushed the tlsmodern branch from 1caa9a8 to 2516160 Compare January 14, 2025 19:34

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2025

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 76a7b99 into openshift:master Apr 22, 2025
22 checks passed

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request May 29, 2025

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-56834: allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified #2315

Open

OCPBUGS-37706: allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified #2135

OCPBUGS-37706: allow TLS1.3 or modern profile to be specified #2135

Uh oh!

Conversation

sanchezl commented Nov 15, 2024

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 15, 2024

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 16, 2024

Uh oh!

sanchezl commented Nov 16, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 17, 2024

Uh oh!

wangke19 commented Dec 19, 2024

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 19, 2024

Uh oh!

wangke19 commented Dec 20, 2024

Uh oh!

wangke19 commented Dec 20, 2024

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 20, 2024

Uh oh!

wangke19 commented Jan 9, 2025

Uh oh!

sanchezl commented Jan 14, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 14, 2025

Uh oh!

jacobsee commented Apr 19, 2025

Uh oh!

kevinrizza commented Apr 19, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 19, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 20, 2025

Uh oh!

jacobsee commented Apr 20, 2025

Uh oh!

jacobsee commented Apr 20, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 20, 2025

Uh oh!

jacobsee commented Apr 20, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 20, 2025

Uh oh!

wangke19 commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

wangke19 commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

jacobsee commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

dusk125 commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

jacobsee commented Apr 21, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 22, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Uh oh!

sanchezl commented Nov 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading