Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Jul 10, 2020

Following the pattern from e7bb102 (#10152), the e2e-aws -> e2e change declares the router presubmits to be platform-agnostic.

The AWS -> GCP change takes advantage of the platform-agnosticism to shift CI load from AWS (where we're currently pegging Boskos lease capacity) to GCP (where we have some spare lease capacity).

Procedure docs in flight in #10166.

Following the pattern from e7bb102
(ci-operator/config/openshift/cluster-version-operator: Generic
e2e-gcp -> e2e for 4.4+, 2020-07-09, openshift#10152), the "e2e-aws" -> "e2e"
change declares the router presubmits to be platform-agnostic.

The AWS -> GCP change takes advantage of the platform-agnosticism to
shift CI load from AWS (where we're currently pegging Boskos lease
capacity) to GCP (where we have some spare lease capacity).
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/rehearse/openshift/router/release-4.7/e2e 34bdc50 link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/router/master/e2e-upgrade 34bdc50 link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/router/release-4.7/e2e-upgrade 34bdc50 link /test pj-rehearse

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Jul 10, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Miciah, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 10, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 788bcce into openshift:master Jul 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: Updated the following 9 configmaps:

  • ci-operator-4.7-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-release-4.7.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/router/openshift-router-release-4.7.yaml
  • job-config-master configmap in namespace ci at cluster api.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-master-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/router/openshift-router-master-presubmits.yaml
  • job-config-4.6 configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-release-4.6-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/router/openshift-router-release-4.6-presubmits.yaml
  • job-config-4.6 configmap in namespace ci at cluster api.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-release-4.6-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/router/openshift-router-release-4.6-presubmits.yaml
  • job-config-4.7 configmap in namespace ci at cluster api.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-release-4.7-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/router/openshift-router-release-4.7-presubmits.yaml
  • job-config-4.7 configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-release-4.7-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/router/openshift-router-release-4.7-presubmits.yaml
  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/router/openshift-router-master.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.6-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-release-4.6.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/router/openshift-router-release-4.6.yaml
  • job-config-master configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-router-master-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/router/openshift-router-master-presubmits.yaml
Details

In response to this:

Following the pattern from e7bb102 (#10152), the e2e-aws -> e2e change declares the router presubmits to be platform-agnostic.

The AWS -> GCP change takes advantage of the platform-agnosticism to shift CI load from AWS (where we're currently pegging Boskos lease capacity) to GCP (where we have some spare lease capacity).

Procedure docs in flight in #10166.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wking wking deleted the platform-agnostic-router-presubmits branch July 15, 2020 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants