Skip to content

Conversation

@sapphi-red
Copy link
Member

@sapphi-red sapphi-red commented Mar 30, 2025

Expected to be used for treeshake.manualPureFunctions support.

Copy link
Member Author

sapphi-red commented Mar 30, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 30, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #10128 will create unknown performance changes

Comparing 03-30-feat_ecmascript_add_is_pure_call_to_mayhavesideeffectscontext_ (ac2ecbb) with main (e004a3f)

Summary

🆕 36 new benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
🆕 codegen[checker.ts] N/A 22.6 ms N/A
🆕 codegen_sourcemap[checker.ts] N/A 65.6 ms N/A
🆕 formatter[antd.js] N/A 7.9 ms N/A
🆕 formatter[react.development.js] N/A 43.6 µs N/A
🆕 formatter[typescript.js] N/A 7.2 ms N/A
🆕 isolated-declarations[vue-id.ts] N/A 58.2 ms N/A
🆕 lexer[RadixUIAdoptionSection.jsx] N/A 21.5 µs N/A
🆕 lexer[antd.js] N/A 24.8 ms N/A
🆕 lexer[cal.com.tsx] N/A 5.9 ms N/A
🆕 lexer[checker.ts] N/A 14.8 ms N/A
🆕 lexer[pdf.mjs] N/A 3.9 ms N/A
🆕 linter[RadixUIAdoptionSection.jsx] N/A 2.7 ms N/A
🆕 linter[cal.com.tsx] N/A 1.2 s N/A
🆕 linter[checker.ts] N/A 2.9 s N/A
🆕 mangler[antd.js] N/A 16 ms N/A
🆕 mangler[react.development.js] N/A 294 µs N/A
🆕 mangler[typescript.js] N/A 39.7 ms N/A
🆕 minifier[antd.js] N/A 165.6 ms N/A
🆕 minifier[react.development.js] N/A 1.8 ms N/A
🆕 minifier[typescript.js] N/A 291.6 ms N/A
... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

@sapphi-red sapphi-red force-pushed the 03-30-feat_ecmascript_add_respect_annotations_to_mayhavesideeffectscontext_ branch from 9135217 to 3244111 Compare March 30, 2025 10:49
@sapphi-red sapphi-red force-pushed the 03-30-feat_ecmascript_add_is_pure_call_to_mayhavesideeffectscontext_ branch from 0a2f7c0 to d54867d Compare March 30, 2025 10:49
@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Mar 30, 2025
@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Mar 30, 2025

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 03-30-feat_ecmascript_add_respect_annotations_to_mayhavesideeffectscontext_ branch from 3244111 to e004a3f Compare March 30, 2025 11:54
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 03-30-feat_ecmascript_add_is_pure_call_to_mayhavesideeffectscontext_ branch from d54867d to ac2ecbb Compare March 30, 2025 11:55
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Mar 30, 2025
Base automatically changed from 03-30-feat_ecmascript_add_respect_annotations_to_mayhavesideeffectscontext_ to main March 30, 2025 12:04
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit ac2ecbb into main Mar 30, 2025
27 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 03-30-feat_ecmascript_add_is_pure_call_to_mayhavesideeffectscontext_ branch March 30, 2025 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-minifier Area - Minifier C-enhancement Category - New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants