-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 284
Update ss58 page #466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update ss58 page #466
Conversation
sacha-l
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple fixes here and there, mostly OSPL rule changes. Let's address this if you agree as a companion to this PR.
Co-authored-by: Sacha Lansky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sacha Lansky <[email protected]>
| For production networks, however, a network-specific version may be desirable to help avoid the key-reuse between networks and some of the problems that it can cause. | ||
| Substrate nodes will default to printing keys in address type 42, though alternative Substrate-based node implementations (e.g. Polkadot) may elect to default to some other type. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Address Formats for Substrate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the below table (only edits for format) wrong ? I see https://paritytech.github.io/substrate/master/src/sp_core/crypto.rs.html#245 has 2 bytes for all formats...?
| | 15 | 1 | 8 | 6 | | ||
| | 16 | 1 | 8 | 7 | | ||
| | 17 | 1 | 8 | 8 | | ||
| | 34 | 1 | 32 | 2 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| | 34 | 1 | 32 | 2 | | |
| | 35 | 1 | 32 | 2 | |
Not sure what is right here, but needs to add up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
your correction seems right to me
Refactor and polish of the page overall, it was missing most of the content in the archive of the old wiki that has no other home and should live here. Missed in #105
closes #114
Outstanding items before done: