-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 284
Update ss58 page #466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Update ss58 page #466
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -7,28 +7,118 @@ category: advanced | |||||
| keywords: | ||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| SS58 is a simple address format designed for Substrate based chains. There's no problem with using | ||||||
| other address formats for a chain, but this serves as a robust default. It is heavily based on | ||||||
| Bitcoin's Base-58-check format with a few alterations. | ||||||
| SS58 is a simple address format designed for Substrate based chains. | ||||||
| There's no problem with using other address formats for a chain, but this serves as a robust default. | ||||||
| It is heavily based on Bitcoin's Base-58-check format with a few alterations. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The basic idea is a base-58 encoded value that can identify a specific account on the Substrate | ||||||
| chain. Different chains have different means of identifying accounts. SS58 is designed to be | ||||||
| extensible for this reason. | ||||||
| The basic idea is a base-58 encoded value which can identify a specific account on the Substrate chain. | ||||||
| Different chains have different means of identifying accounts. | ||||||
| SS58 is designed to be extensible for this reason. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Format in detail | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| This page outlines the implementation of [`Ss58Codec` in Substrate](https://paritytech.github.io/substrate/master/sp_core/crypto/trait.Ss58Codec.html). | ||||||
| Also of note is the cannonical [SS58 registry](https://github.com/paritytech/ss58-registry) of adress type mappings to various networks described below. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Basic format | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The basic format conforms to: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ``` | ||||||
| base58encode ( concat ( <address-type>, <address>, <checksum> ) ) | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| That is, the concatenated byte series of address type, address and checksum then passed into a base-58 encoder. | ||||||
| The `base58encode` function is implemented exactly as [defined](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base58) in Bitcoin and IPFS, using the same alphabet as both. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Address type | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The `<address-type>` is one or more bytes that describe the precise format of the following bytes. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Currently, there exist several valid values: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - 00000000b..=00111111b (0..=63 inclusive): Simple account/address/network identifier. | ||||||
| The byte can be interpreted directly as such an identifier. | ||||||
| - 01000000b..=01111111b (64..=127 inclusive): Full address/address/network identifier. | ||||||
| The lower 6 bits of this byte should be treated as the upper 6 bits of a 14 bit identifier value, with the lower 8 bits defined by the following byte. | ||||||
| This works for all identifiers up to 2**14 (16,383). | ||||||
| - 10000000b..=11111111b (128..=255 inclusive): Reserved for future address format extensions. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The latter (42) is a "wildcard" address that is meant to be equally valid on all Substrate networks that support fixed-length addresses. | ||||||
| For production networks, however, a network-specific version may be desirable to help avoid the key-reuse between networks and some of the problems that it can cause. | ||||||
| Substrate nodes will default to printing keys in address type 42, though alternative Substrate-based node implementations (e.g. Polkadot) may elect to default to some other type. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Address Formats for Substrate | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| There are 16 different address formats, identified by the length (**in bytes**) of the total payload (i.e. including the checksum). | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Total | Type | Raw Account | Checksum | | ||||||
| |:-----:|:----:|:-----------:|:--------:| | ||||||
| | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | ||||||
| | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | | ||||||
| | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | | ||||||
| | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | | ||||||
| | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | | ||||||
| | 8 | 1 | 4 | 3 | | ||||||
| | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | | ||||||
| | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 | | ||||||
| | 11 | 1 | 8 | 2 | | ||||||
| | 12 | 1 | 8 | 3 | | ||||||
| | 13 | 1 | 8 | 4 | | ||||||
| | 14 | 1 | 8 | 5 | | ||||||
| | 15 | 1 | 8 | 6 | | ||||||
| | 16 | 1 | 8 | 7 | | ||||||
| | 17 | 1 | 8 | 8 | | ||||||
| | 34 | 1 | 32 | 2 | | ||||||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
Not sure what is right here, but needs to add up There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. your correction seems right to me |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Checksum types | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Several potential checksum strategies exist within Substrate, giving different length and longevity guarantees. | ||||||
| There are two types of checksum preimages (known as SS58 and AccountID) and many different checksum lengths (1 to 8 bytes). | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| In all cases for Substrate, the [Blake2-256](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLAKE_(hash_function)) hash function is used. | ||||||
| The variants simply select the preimage used as the input to the hash function and the number of bytes taken from its output. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The bytes used are always the left most bytes. | ||||||
| The input to be used is the non-checksum portion of the SS58 byte series used as input to the base-58 function, i.e. `concat( <address-type>, <address> )`. | ||||||
| A context prefix of `0x53533538505245`, (the string `SS58PRE`) is prepended to the input to give the final hashing preimage. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The advantage of using more checksum bytes is simply that more bytes provide a greater degree of protection against input errors and index alteration at the cost of widening the textual address by an extra few characters. | ||||||
| For the account ID format, this is insignificant and therefore no 1-byte alternative is provided. | ||||||
| For the shorter account-index formats, the extra byte represents a far greater portion of the final address, so it is left for further up the stack (though not necessarily the user themself) to determine the best tradeoff for their purposes. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Simple/full address types and account/address/network identifiers | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| [The registry](https://github.com/paritytech/ss58-registry) expresses the status of the account/address/network *identifiers*. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| *Identifiers* up to value 64 may be expressed in a *simple* format address, in which the least significant byte (LSB) of the identifier value is expressed as the first byte of the encoded address. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| For identifiers of between 64 and 16,383, the *full* format address must be used. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| This encoding is slightly fiddly since we encode as little endian (LE), yet the first two bits (which should encode 64s and 128s) are already used up with the necessary `01` prefix. | ||||||
| We treat the first two bytes as a 16 bit sequence, and we disregard the first two bits of that (since they're already fixed to be `01`). | ||||||
| With the remaining 14 bits, we encode our identifier value as LE, with the assumption that the two missing higher order bits are zero. | ||||||
| This effectively spreads the low-order byte across the boundary between the two bytes. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Thus the 14-bit identifier `0b00HHHHHH_MMLLLLLL` is expressed in the two bytes as: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - `0b01LLLLLL` | ||||||
| - `0bHHHHHHMM` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Identifiers of 16384 and beyond are not currently supported. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Validating addresses | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| There are several ways to verify that a value is a valid SS58 address. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Subkey | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| You can use the [Subkey](/v3/tools/subkey) `inspect` | ||||||
| subcommand, which accepts the seed phrase, a hex-encoded private key, or an SS58 address as the input | ||||||
| URI. If the input is a valid address, it will return a list containing the corresponding public | ||||||
| key (hex), account ID, and SS58 values. | ||||||
| You can use the [Subkey](/v3/tools/subkey) `inspect` subcommand, which accepts the seed phrase, a hex-encoded private key, or an SS58 address as the input URI. | ||||||
| If the input is a valid address, it will return a list containing the corresponding public key (hex), account ID and SS58 values. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Subkey assumes that an address is based on a public/private keypair. In the case of inspecting an | ||||||
| address, it will return the 32 byte account ID. Not all addresses in Substrate-based networks are | ||||||
| based on keys. | ||||||
| Subkey assumes that an address is based on a public/private keypair. | ||||||
| In the case of inspecting an address, it will return the 32 byte account ID. | ||||||
| Not all addresses in Substrate-based networks are based on keys. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| <Message | ||||||
| type={`gray`} | ||||||
|
|
@@ -53,8 +143,7 @@ Invalid phrase/URI given | |||||
|
|
||||||
| ### PolkadotJS API | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| For verifying an address in your JavaScript projects, you can utilize the functions built | ||||||
| into the [PolkadotJS API](https://polkadot.js.org/docs/api/). | ||||||
| For verifying an address in your JavaScript projects, you can utilize the functions built into the [PolkadotJS API](https://polkadot.js.org/docs/api/). | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ```javascript | ||||||
| // Import Polkadot.js API dependencies. | ||||||
|
|
@@ -80,25 +169,11 @@ const isValid = isValidSubstrateAddress() | |||||
| console.log(isValid) | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Community Built | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Below you will find a list of other Substrate API tools built in various languages by our community. | ||||||
| They each validate addresses in their own way, and can act as a starting point. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [Python Substrate Interface](https://polkascan.github.io/py-substrate-interface/#substrateinterface.Keypair) - developed by Polkascan. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [Go Substrate RPC client](https://github.com/centrifuge/go-substrate-rpc-client) - developed by Centrifuge. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [C++ Polkadot Substrate API](https://github.com/usetech-llc/polkadot_api_cpp) - developed by Usetech. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [.Net API](https://github.com/usetech-llc/polkadot_api_dotnet) - developed by Usetech. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [Go implemented utilities](https://github.com/itering/subscan-essentials) - developed by Subscan. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [SS58 Transform](https://polkadot.subscan.io/tools/ss58_transform) - to manually verify an address (sanity check). | ||||||
nuke-web3 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Learn more | ||||||
| ## Learn more | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [`Ss58Codec` in Substrate](https://paritytech.github.io/substrate/master/sp_core/crypto/trait.Ss58Codec.html) | ||||||
| - The cannonical [SS58 registry](https://github.com/paritytech/ss58-registry) | ||||||
| - [Polkadot-js API on GitHub](https://github.com/polkadot-js/api) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - [Install Subkey](/v3/tools/subkey#installation) | ||||||
| - [Ecosystem client | ||||||
| libs](https://substrate.io/ecosystem/resources/awesome-substrate/#client-libraries) and [tools(https://substrate.io/ecosystem/resources/awesome-substrate/#tools)] | ||||||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the below table (only edits for format) wrong ? I see https://paritytech.github.io/substrate/master/src/sp_core/crypto.rs.html#245 has 2 bytes for all formats...?