Skip to content

Conversation

@zanella
Copy link

@zanella zanella commented Dec 16, 2015

The valid IP can be used for communicating w/ docker and w/ the outside, which is probably what you want when developing

The valid IP can be used for communicating w/ docker and w/ the outside, which is probably what you want when developing
@spencergibb
Copy link
Member

@dsyer @adriancole @marcingrzejszczak This pains me that I wrote this as a static method. I'd like to make the interfaces to skip configurable. Should I add a parameter that takes a configuration properties object, or move this to a bean? As I type the question, the answer seems to me to move it to a bean if I'm going to make it configurable.

@dsyer
Copy link
Contributor

dsyer commented Dec 21, 2015

Yep. It's not too late for 1.1.0. The ship has sailed on Brixton.M4 I think (so please don't change the architecture in anything that depends on commons till after that).

@spencergibb
Copy link
Member

@dsyer will do.

@spencergibb
Copy link
Member

Closing in favor of #75. Thanks for getting the ball rolling on this.

spencergibb added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants