-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
perf(css): only run postcss when needed #19061
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf(css): only run postcss when needed #19061
Conversation
| // postcss processing is not needed | ||
| if ( | ||
| lang === 'css' && | ||
| lang !== 'sss' && | ||
| !postcssConfig && | ||
| !isModule && | ||
| !needInlineImport && | ||
| !hasUrl | ||
| ) { | ||
| return { code, map: null } | ||
| return { code, map: preprocessorMap ?? null, deps } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With this PR, If the preprocessor removed all @import, we might be able to return at this line. (previously postcss was run)
| if ( | ||
| urlReplacer && | ||
| // if there's an @import, we need to add this plugin | ||
| // regradless of whether it contains url() or image-set(), | ||
| // because we don't know the content referenced by @import | ||
| (needInlineImport || cssUrlRE.test(code) || cssImageSetRE.test(code)) | ||
| ) { | ||
| postcssPlugins.push( | ||
| UrlRewritePostcssPlugin({ | ||
| replacer: urlReplacer, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
UrlRewritePostcssPlugin was always pushed, so postcss was ran always.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (!postcssPlugins.length) { | ||
| if (lang !== 'sss' && !postcssPlugins.length) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This lang !== 'sss' was not needed because !postcssPlugins.length was always false.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a bit confused about this part. Isn't sugarss support added as a postcss plugin, so postcssPlugins.length should be at least one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's because sugarss is a parser and not a plugin.
vite/packages/vite/src/node/plugins/css.ts
Line 1447 in da0caf5
| parser: lang === 'sss' ? loadSss(config.root) : postcssOptions.parser, |
Now that you mentioned about it, I think we should change this condition to
lang !== 'sss' && !postcssOptions.parser && !postcssPlugins.length.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I didn't know it's a parser. Yeah I think checking for parser seems better too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated 👍
|
|
||
| if (!devSourcemap) { | ||
| return { | ||
| ast: postcssResult, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ast was not used anywhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The sourcemaps changed because postcss does not run on these files anymore.
|
/ecosystem-ci run |
commit: |
|
📝 Ran ecosystem CI on
✅ analogjs, astro, laravel, marko, nuxt, previewjs, quasar, qwik, rakkas, storybook, sveltekit, unocss, vike, vite-environment-examples, vite-plugin-pwa, vite-plugin-react, vite-plugin-react-swc, vite-plugin-vue, vite-setup-catalogue, vitepress, vuepress |
|
ladle fail is not related to this PR. vitest is failing because of the change in #19004. So it should be fine. |
Co-authored-by: Bjorn Lu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bjorn Lu <[email protected]>
Description